Evidence Hub

Diabetes mellitus with severe insulin resistance in a young male patient with a heterozygous pathogenic IRS1 frameshift variant

Osawa Y, Ichiwata N, Kenmotsu J, Okada T, Masunaga Y, Ogata T, Morioka I, Urakami T

Clinical pediatric endocrinology : case reports and clinical investigations : official journal of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, 2024

Abstract

We present the case of a young male patient (height, 158.1 cm [+3.3 standard deviation (SD)]; weight, 63.7 kg [body mass index, 25.5]) with diabetes mellitus and severe insulin resistance associated with a heterozygous pathogenic insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) frameshift mutation. The patient also had severe acanthosis nigricans. Notably, the patient's father was undergoing treatment with high doses of insulin for diabetes mellitus, and had been experiencing angina pectoris. Laboratory data showed a fasting plasma glucose level of 88 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) of 7.4%, fasting insulin level of 43.1 µg/mL, and a homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) score of 9.36, indicating hyperinsulinism. Oral glucose tolerance test revealed a diabetic pattern and insulin hypersecretion. In addition, the patient had hyperlipidemia. Genetic studies revealed a heterozygous frameshift variant of IRS1 [NM_005544.3:c.1791dupG:p.(His598Alafs*13)] in the patient and his father, which can impair the binding and activation of phosphoinositide 3 (PI-3) kinase and defectively mediate the translocation of glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4) in adipose tissues, possibly leading to glucose intolerance. Therefore, this variant may be disease causing. After confirming IRS1 mutation, metformin was administered, and physical exercise and dietary management were initiated; metformin was well tolerated, and optimal glycemic control was maintained.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free