Evidence Hub

First-in-Human Phase I Trial of HRS-2129, a Selective Nav1.8 Inhibitor: Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics in Healthy Subjects

Huang J, Wu Q, Wang S, Xie J, Deng K, Yang S, Yang X, Chen C et al.

Drug design, development and therapy, 2026

44 participants

Abstract

Background: HRS-2129 is a novel, orally administered, selective Nav1.8 sodium channel blocker under development for pain management. This first-in-human study evaluated its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) in healthy subjects.

Methods: Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted: a single ascending dose (SAD) study (25-600 mg, n=44) and a multiple ascending dose (MAD) study (25 mg BID, 25 mg QD, 75 mg QD, n=23). Safety, PK, and PD (cold/heat pain thresholds and pain tolerance time) were assessed.

Results: HRS-2129 exhibited favorable tolerability following a single administration (25-600 mg) and repeated dosing at 25 mg BID. No severe or serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in the SAD study. One SAE (drug rash) led to discontinuation in the 75 mg QD cohort during the MAD phase. Common AEs were mild and included proteinuria, occult blood, and ECG T-wave abnormalities. PK analysis showed rapid absorption, a long half-life supporting once-daily dosing, less than dose-proportional exposure, and moderate accumulation at steady state. Food delayed absorption without affecting overall exposure. PD results showed increased pain tolerance time in the ice-water bath test without clear dose dependency.

Conclusion: Within the evaluated dose range, HRS-2129 demonstrated a favorable safety profile, predictable PK with low accumulation, and preliminary evidence of analgesic effect. These results support further clinical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free