Evidence Hub

Predictors of Pregnancy in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Mary Rausch, Richard S. Legro, Huiman Xie Barnhart, William D. Schlaff, Bruce Richard Carr, Michael P. Diamond, Sandra Ann Carson, Michael P. Steinkampf et al.

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2009

626 participants · 95 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of anovulatory infertility. The selection of first-line therapies for ovulation induction is empiric. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to develop a clinically useful predictive model of live birth with varying ovulation induction methods. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We built four prognostic models from a large multicenter randomized controlled infertility trial of 626 women with PCOS performed at academic health centers in the United States to predict success of ovulation, conception, pregnancy, and live birth, evaluating the influence of patients' baseline characteristics. INTERVENTIONS: Ovulation was induced with clomiphene, metformin, or the combination of both for up to six cycles or conception. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome of the trial was the rate of live births. RESULTS: Baseline free androgen index, baseline proinsulin level, interaction of treatment arm with body mass index, and duration of attempting conception were significant predictors in all four models. History of a prior loss predicted ovulation and conception, but not pregnancy or live birth. A modified Ferriman Gallwey hirsutism score of less than 8 was predictive of conception, pregnancy, and live birth (although it did not predict ovulation success). Age was a divergent predictor based on outcome; age greater than 34 predicted ovulation, whereas age less than 35 was a predictive factor for a successful pregnancy and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 626 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free