Evidence Hub

Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients Undergoing Acid-Suppressive Treatment: A Large Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matching

Kim I, Kim JS, Park JM, Cheung DY, Kim TH, Chung WC, Oh JH, Choi HH et al.

Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

606,460 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant concern in patients undergoing acid-suppressive therapy. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the risk of CDI in patients treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and potassium-competitive acid blockers (tegoprazan). Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated 606,460 individuals who were prescribed PPIs, H2RAs, or tegoprazan for more than 7 days, resulting in 22,431 matched individuals after propensity score matching. The primary outcome was CDI incidence within 12 weeks of medication use. Results: Patients receiving PPIs exhibited a significantly higher relative risk (RR) (RR: 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18–2.91) of developing CDI than those receiving H2RAs. Tegoprazan showed no significant increase in CDI risk (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.64–1.79) compared to H2RAs. The risk of CDI increased with a longer duration of acid suppressant use. No dose-dependent differences in CDI occurrence were observed across PPI doses and no significant differences were found in the incidence of severe CDI among the groups. Conclusions: PPIs are associated with a higher risk of CDI than H2RAs. These findings highlight the need for careful selection of acid-suppressive therapies, particularly in high-risk populations.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 606,460 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free