Evidence Hub

Bridging radiomics and histopathology: cross-modality consistency of radiomic features from CT to micro-CT in NSCLC.

Brizzi L, Bortolotto C, Cabini RF, Brero F, Megalizzi S, D'Ambrosio G, Filibian M, Gioia R et al.

European radiology experimental, 2026

60 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Radiomics extracts quantitative features from medical images that may provide non-invasive biomarkers of tumor biology and heterogeneity. However, few studies have explored radiomics on micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) or its transferability to clinical CT. This study investigates the reproducibility and the potential biological correlation of radiomic features across in vivo CT, ex vivo CT, and ex vivo micro-CT in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 60 NSCLC patients with preoperative CT scans and surgical specimens was analyzed. Ex vivo CT and micro-CT images were acquired and compared with in vivo CT using standardized preprocessing, including normalization, resampling, and registration. Tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were semi-automatically segmented, and 93 radiomic features were extracted with Pyradiomics. Cross-modality reproducibility and associations with histotype were evaluated using Spearman correlation, intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS: Normalization and volume matching improved feature repeatability, with the highest agreement observed in normalized datasets using subsampled ROIs. Four texture-based features consistently showed high reproducibility and potential biological correlation, likely reflecting intratumoral heterogeneity and variation in cell density: DependenceNonUniformity, GrayLevelNonUniformity (GLDM and GLRLM), and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free