Intravenous cyclophosphamide vs rituximab for the treatment of early diffuse scleroderma lung disease: open label, randomized, controlled trial
Abstract
Objectives
SSc is characterized by fibrotic changes in the skin and lung, and the mainstay of treatment has been CYC. B cell involvement suggests that rituximab (RTX) may also be of therapeutic benefit. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of RTX compared with CYC in retarding the progression of interstitial lung disease and skin manifestations of primary SSc.
Methods
We randomly assigned 60 patients of dcSSc, age 18-60 years with skin and lung involvement, to monthly pulses of CYC 500 mg/m2 or RTX 1000 mg × 2 doses at 0, 15 days. Primary outcomes were forced vital capacity (FVC) percent predicted at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were: absolute change in litres (FVC-l) at 6 months; modified Rodnan skin scores at 6 months, 6-min walk test, Medsgers score and new onset or worsening of existing pulmonary hypertension by echocardiographic criteria.
Results
The FVC [%mean (s.d.)] in the RTX group improved from 61.30 (11.28) to 67.52 (13.59), while in the CYC group it declined from 59.25 (12.96) to 58.06 (11.23) at 6 months (P = 0.003). The change of FVC was 1.51 (0.45) l to 1.65 (0.47) l in the RTX group, compared with 1.42 (0.49) to 1.42 (0.46) l in the CYC group. The mRSS changed from 21.77 (9.86) to 12.10 (10.14) in the RTX group and 23.83 (9.28) to 18.33 (7.69) in the CYC group after 6 months. Serious adverse events were more common in the CYC group.
Conclusion
RTX is a safe and effective alternative to CYC in the primary therapy of skin and lung…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study
- Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120,075 UK Biobank participants
- Clinical presentation and virological assessment of confirmed human monkeypox virus cases in Spain: a prospective observational cohort study
- Comparison of the characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza: a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study
- Lifestyle risk factors, inflammatory mechanisms, and COVID-19 hospitalization: A community-based cohort study of 387,109 adults in UK
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.