Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Tegoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Zhou BG, Xu YM, Xu WJ, Liu J, Deng B

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026

1,909 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic resistance undermines conventional Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapies. Tegoprazan-amoxicillin (TA) dual therapy is a promising alternative, but its efficacy and safety compared with other treatment regimens remain unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of TA dual therapy in eradicating H. pylori.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to December 2025. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared TA dual therapy with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) or proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based high-dose dual therapy (PPI-HDDT) in adults with H. pylori infection. The outcomes were H. pylori eradication rate, adverse events, and medication adherence. Evidence quality was assessed via GRADE.

Results: Six RCTs (n = 1909) were included. TA dual therapy showed no significant difference in eradication rate compared with BQT (n = 5 RCTs, ITT analysis: 78.0% vs. 81.4%, RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.88-1.05, p = 0.44; PP analysis: 84.6% vs. 86.2%, RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.06, p = 0.39; low-quality evidence), confirmed by trial sequential analysis. TA dual therapy had a lower overall adverse event rate (11.3% vs. 22.5%, RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.67, p < 0.00001; moderate-quality evidence) but similar adherence (95.7% vs. 94.5%, RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03, p = 0.31; moderate-quality evidence) compared with BQT. Efficacy and safety were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,909 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free