Evidence Hub

Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kovarbasic CA, El Khiati C, Knölker HC, Benlloch S, Barrasa A

Gastro hep advances, 2026

8,789 participants

Abstract

Background and aims: Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged as an alternative to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, much of the available evidence is based on comparisons with suboptimal PPI-based regimens. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare P-CAB-based regimens with bismuth-containing PPI (B-PPI)-based quadruple therapies as first-line treatment for H pylori eradication.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized controlled trials comparing P-CAB-based regimens with B-PPI-based quadruple therapies were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated. The primary outcome was the eradication rate; secondary outcomes were treatment compliance and subgroup analysis according to the specific P-CAB used.

Results: Twenty-five trials including 8789 patients were analyzed. In the intention-to-treat analysis, pooled eradication rates were 86.8% for P-CAB-based regimens and 83.3% for PPI-based quadruple therapy (RR: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.07; P = .005). In the per-protocol analysis, no statistical significance was observed (89.4% vs 88.5%; RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.99-1.05; P = .17). Treatment compliance was similar between groups (92.6% vs 91.3%; RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.99-1.02; P = .40). In subgroup analyses, no significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8,789 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free