Evidence Hub

Data-Driven Approaches for Autism Detection: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Algorithms and Datasets

N A, Patil CM

International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience, 2026

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition with a broad spectrum of symptoms, which makes timely and accurate diagnosis challenging. The development of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has created opportunities for automated ASD screening and detection. This systematic review focuses on the analyses of 59 peer-reviewed studies on unimodal and multimodal approaches to ASD detection that were published between 2019 and 2025. The results demonstrated that classical ML algorithms (such as logistic regression [LR], support vector machines [SVM] and random forests [RF]) and DL models (convolutional neural networks [CNN], recurrent neural networks (RNN) and transformers) were used to assess the accuracy of the diagnosis for a variety of data modalities ranging from behavioural measures to neuroimaging, electroencephalography (EEG), eye tracking and speech, with accuracy from 68% to 99%. A careful examination of these studies, however, shows that they share certain common flaws, including small sample size, demographic bias, overfitting and absence of external validation. Hybrid multimodal frameworks have been shown to yield consistent performance improvements over unimodal frameworks, with accuracies of 95%-99% achieved through attention, graph-based learning and hybrid fusion approaches. This review highlights four major points: (1) a critical review of dataset ethics and validity, even for non-clinical facial image datasets; (2) an…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free