Evidence Hub

From algorithmic innovation to clinical deployment: A systematic review of methodological gaps limiting federated learning in healthcare

Vijayasarathy S

International journal of medical informatics, 2026

Abstract

Objective: Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm designed to enable model training across decentralized data sources without requiring data centralization. This review critically examines FL as a methodological approach in biomedical informatics, summarizing its conceptual foundations, methodological variants, successes, and limitations, and identifying directions for future research.

Methods: We conducted a systematic methodological review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2017 and March 2025. Articles were included if they proposed, extended, or critically analyzed FL methods for biomedical or life science data. Methods were categorized by federation topology, optimization strategy, data heterogeneity handling, privacy mechanisms, evaluation design, and translational readiness.

Results: From 8,412 records, 97 articles met inclusion criteria. Rapid methodological innovation exists in optimization and privacy mechanisms, while support for design-time evaluation and governance remains limited.

Conclusion: Federated learning represents a significant methodological advance in biomedical informatics but current implementations address only a subset of translational challenges. Future work must integrate study design, evaluation, interpretability, and governance into FL methods.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free