Evidence Hub

From Reactive to Proactive Healthcare: Synergizing Wearable Biomarkers and Machine Learning in Digital Therapeutics

Park K, Park EKC, Park WH, Jeon EY

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

Abstract

The integration of digital therapeutics (DTx), wearable electronic devices, and artificial intelligence (AI) represents a significant advancement in personalized healthcare. The primary purpose of this structured narrative review is to evaluate the convergence of these technologies, providing a consolidated framework that bridges the gap between raw biometric data acquisition and actionable, AI-driven clinical insights. This paper synthesizes the latest literature on the intersection of mobile health (mHealth), machine learning (ML), and physiological tracking, with a primary focus on heart rate variability (HRV) and associated biochemical markers, such as cortisol, salivary alpha-amylase, and interleukins. Instead of viewing wearable outputs simply as raw data, we critically evaluate the technical verification and clinical validation required to define them as true "digital biomarkers." By evaluating multimodal sensor technologies and advanced predictive algorithms, this paper outlines the clinical utility of digital biomarkers in diagnosing and proactively managing cardiovascular, neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric conditions, noting classification accuracies frequently exceeding 85% in controlled settings. However, we strongly caution that internally validated performance in controlled settings does not inherently demonstrate external clinical utility. The clinical relevance of this study lies in its holistic approach to identifying how continuous monitoring can…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free