A Systematic Literature Review on Client Selection in Federated Learning
Abstract
With the arising concerns of privacy within machine learning, federated learning (FL) was invented in 2017, in which the clients, such as mobile devices, train a model and send the update to the centralized server. Choosing clients randomly for FL can harm learning performance due to different reasons. Many studies have proposed approaches to address the challenges of client selection of FL. However, no systematic literature review (SLR) on this topic existed. This SLR investigates the state of the art of client selection in FL and answers the challenges, solutions, and metrics to evaluate the solutions. We systematically reviewed 47 primary studies. The main challenges found in client selection are heterogeneity, resource allocation, communication costs, and fairness. The client selection schemes aim to improve the original random selection algorithm by focusing on one or several of the aforementioned challenges. The most common metric used is testing accuracy versus communication rounds, as testing accuracy measures the successfulness of the learning and preferably in as few communication rounds as possible, as they are very expensive. Although several possible improvements can be made with the current state of client selection, the most beneficial ones are evaluating the impact of unsuccessful clients and gaining a more theoretical understanding of the impact of fairness in FL.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Active Learning during Federated Learning for Object Detection
- Fairness-aware federated learning
- Decentralized Federated Learning
- Building a Personally Identifiable Information Recognizer in a Privacy Preserved Manner Using Automated Annotation and Federated Learning
- Preservation of Patient Level Privacy: Federated Classification and Calibration Models
- Efficient explainable federated learning
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.