Advancing breast, lung and prostate cancer research with federated learning. A systematic review
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) is advancing cancer research by enabling privacy-preserving collaborative training of machine learning (ML) models on diverse, multi-centre data. This systematic review synthesises current knowledge on state-of-the-art FL in oncology, focusing on breast, lung, and prostate cancer. Unlike previous surveys, we critically evaluate FL's real-world implementation and impact, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing ML generalisability and performance in clinical settings. Our analysis reveals that FL outperformed centralised ML in 15 out of 25 studies, spanning diverse models and clinical applications, including multi-modal integration for precision medicine. Despite challenges identified in reproducibility and standardisation, FL demonstrates substantial potential for advancing cancer research. We propose future research focus on addressing these limitations and investigating advanced FL methods to fully harness data diversity and realise the transformative power of cutting-edge FL in cancer care.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Active Learning during Federated Learning for Object Detection
- Fairness-aware federated learning
- Decentralized Federated Learning
- Building a Personally Identifiable Information Recognizer in a Privacy Preserved Manner Using Automated Annotation and Federated Learning
- Preservation of Patient Level Privacy: Federated Classification and Calibration Models
- Efficient explainable federated learning
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.