Diagnostic accuracy of traditional and deep learning methods for detecting depression based on speech features: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Depression diagnosis faces challenges of subjectivity and delay. Speech features offer potential objective biomarkers, but a systematic comparison of traditional machine learning (TML) and deep learning (DL) models is lacking.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of TML and DL models for depression detection using speech features, and to examine subgroup effects across sample size, validation strategy, language, and diagnostic criteria.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched 9 databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, IEEE, Cochrane, ACM Digital Library, and Web of Science) from inception to April 2025. Eligible studies included clinically diagnosed patients with depression and healthy controls, assessed using speech-based TML or DL models, and reporting sensitivity, specificity, or the area under the curve (AUC). Risk of bias was evaluated using the diagnostic Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). Random-effects bivariate models pooled diagnostic performance, and heterogeneity, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses were conducted.
Results: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria (9 TML, 16 DL). TML models showed pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.88), specificity 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.90), and AUC 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92). DL models achieved pooled sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88), specificity 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.90), and AUC 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.93). Subgroup…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Active Learning during Federated Learning for Object Detection
- Fairness-aware federated learning
- Decentralized Federated Learning
- Building a Personally Identifiable Information Recognizer in a Privacy Preserved Manner Using Automated Annotation and Federated Learning
- Preservation of Patient Level Privacy: Federated Classification and Calibration Models
- Efficient explainable federated learning
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.