Evidence Hub

Machine learning and deep learning for diagnosis of Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis

Fan H, Chen S, Cai F, Tang C, Chen X, Chen J, Wu P

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome (PMOS) is a prevalent endocrine disorder with a challenging, heterogeneous diagnosis. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models show promise for automated diagnosis, but a quantitative synthesis of their accuracy is lacking.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ML/DL models for PMOS and identify factors influencing performance.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to January 26, 2026. Studies developing or validating ML/DL models for PMOS diagnosis were included. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. A random-effects model with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method was used to pool estimates. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. Heterogeneity was quantified (I 2), and meta-regression and subgroup analyses explored sources of heterogeneity.

Results: Fifty-six studies (60 datasets) were included. Pooled sensitivity was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94; I2 = 93.6%) and specificity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96; I 2 = 93.4%), with an HSROC area under the curve of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99). Prediction intervals were wide (sensitivity: 50%-99%; specificity: 53%-100%). Egger's test suggested small-study effects (P P = 0.002) and modeling variables (ultrasound image vs. clinical parameters, coefficient=2.43, P = 0.007) as independent predictors of higher accuracy; model type was not significant after adjustment. Ultrasound…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free