Evidence Hub

Clinical and Imaging Data-based Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-analysis

Chen Y, Ma H, Liu X

Current medical imaging, 2025

12,755 participants

Abstract

Introduction: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Machine Learning (ML) models for early prediction of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants, addressing the need for timely risk stratification.

Methods: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and other databases identified 9 eligible studies (12,755 infants). Data were extracted and pooled using bivariate generalized linear mixed models. Study quality was assessed via QUADAS-2.

Results: ML models demonstrated high accuracy (pooled sensitivity: 0.81, specificity: 0.85, AUC: 0.90). Multimodal models and ensemble algorithms (e.g., Random Forest) outperformed single-modality approaches. Models using data from the first 7 postnatal days achieved superior performance compared to those using data from day 28.

Discussion: ML enables ultra-early BPD prediction, preceding conventional diagnosis by weeks. Heterogeneity in data modalities and validation strategies highlights the need for standardized reporting.

Conclusion: ML-based BPD prediction shows promise for clinical translation but requires prospective validation and cost-effectiveness analysis.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 12,755 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free