Evidence Hub

Optimized summary-statistic-based single-cell eQTL meta-analysis

Maryna Korshevniuk, H. Westra, R. Oelen, M. van der Wijst, L. Franke, M. Bonder, José Alquicira-Hernández, Daniel Kaptijn et al.

Scientific Reports, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

The identification of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) holds great potential to improve the interpretation of disease-associated genetic variation. As many such disease-associated variants act in a context-, tissue- or even cell-type-specific manner, single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data is uniquely suitable for identifying the specific cell type or context in which these genetic variants act. However, due to the limited sample sizes in single-cell studies, discovery of cell-type-specific eQTLs is now limited. To improve power to detect such eQTLs, large-scale joint analyses are needed. These are however, complicated by privacy constraints due to sharing of genotype data and the measurement and technical variety across different scRNA-seq datasets as a result of differences in mRNA capture efficiency, experimental protocols, and sequencing strategies. A solution to these issues is a federated weighted meta-analysis (WMA) approach in which summary statistics are integrated using dataset-specific weights. Here, we compare different strategies and provide best practice recommendations for eQTL WMA across scRNA-seq datasets.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free