Evidence Hub

Predictive accuracy of machine learning and markerless gait analysis for return-to-sport following lower extremity injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Satija R, Dkhar D

Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026

Abstract

Background and objective: Anterior cruciate ligament and lower extremity injuries impose a substantial burden in sports medicine, yet conventional assessments fail to capture the dynamic nature of injury risk and recovery. Machine learning and markerless gait analysis offer potential improvements in predicting return-to-sport readiness and re-injury risk, but their clinical reliability remains uncertain. This review evaluates the predictive accuracy and clinical applicability of these approaches.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and CINAHL was conducted up to March 2026. Studies involving adults with lower extremity injuries using machine learning or markerless systems and reporting predictive metrics were included. Pooled accuracy estimates were calculated using a fixed-effect model with logit transformation. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

Results: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria for quantitative synthesis. For return-to-sport readiness (six wearable sensor studies), pooled accuracy was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95; I² = 52.2%). Sensitivity ranged from 0.79 to 0.99, and specificity from 0.75 to 0.99. For re-injury risk (two wearable sensor studies), pooled accuracy was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95; I² = 0.0%). Markerless motion analysis demonstrated sensitivity of 0.82 and specificity of 0.77 for injury risk screening. Deep learning and ensemble models outperformed traditional approaches.

Conclusion: Wearable…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free