Evidence Hub

Research on machine learning-based clinical prediction models: a bibliometric analysis

Li Q, Zeng M, Liang D, Zheng X, Zhang X, Martin-Payo R

Frontiers in oncology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a transformative approach for developing high-performance clinical prediction models (CPMs). By leveraging multidimensional patient data, ML enables more accurate disease risk stratification, prognostic assessment, and clinical decision-making. In recent years, research on CPMs has expanded rapidly, with nearly 250,000 publications indexed as of 2024. Despite this remarkable growth, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the field is currently lacking.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the global research status, evolutionary trends, and thematic hotspots of machine learning-based clinical prediction models (ML-CPMs) through bibliometric and visualization techniques.

Methods: Publications related to ML-CPMs were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and the Scopus database (up to May 9, 2025). Bibliometric analyses were performed using various tools, including R, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace, to generate annual publication trends, collaboration networks, and journal distributions, as well as co-citation, clustering, and keyword analyses.

Results: A total of 8,619 publications (8,000 original articles and 619 reviews) from 118 countries were identified. Since 2015, annual publications have grown exponentially (R² = 0.9919). While China led in total publication volume, the United States maintained the highest academic influence (H-index = 105; Total Citations = 66,788). Harvard University and BMC Medical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free