Evidence Hub

Artificial intelligence-enabled liquid biopsy in cancer: a systematic review and meta- analysis of diagnostic performance and biological implications

Sisca L, Polito MG, Sisca E, Iuliani M, Cortellini A, Vincenzi B, Tonini G, Pantano F

Frontiers in oncology, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Background: Liquid biopsy offers a minimally invasive approach for cancer detection and monitoring, but its diagnostic performance is often limited by low signal abundance and biological noise. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been proposed as a computational framework to integrate heterogeneous and biologically noisy circulating biomarker data; however, the biological underpinnings, clinical relevance, and translational meaning of the reported performance gains remain unclear.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of studies published between 2022 and 2025 applying AI-based methods to liquid-biopsy data for oncologic diagnosis. Extracted outcomes included AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, cancer type, analyte class, and AI model. Pooled AUROC and absolute AUROC differences between AI-based and non-AI approaches were estimated with 95% confidence intervals using a random-effects model. AUROC values were logit-transformed prior to pooling to stabilize variance and were subsequently back-transformed for presentation. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic.

Results: Twenty-eight studies across multiple tumor types met inclusion criteria, of which ten provided extractable data for quantitative synthesis. AI-enhanced liquid biopsy achieved a pooled AUROC of 0.924 (95% CI, 0.879-0.953). When head-to-head comparisons were available, AI-based models demonstrated an absolute AUROC improvement of 0.025 (95% CI, 0.019-0.030)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free