Evidence Hub

Artificial intelligence-driven preoperative CT 3D planning: a narrative review on improving the accuracy of acetabular cup angle and size in total hip arthroplasty

Wang Y, Wang T, Wang S

Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a well-established treatment for end-stage hip disorders, yet its success heavily depends on precise acetabular cup positioning and sizing. Conventional planning, based on manual CT interpretation, is time-consuming, operator-dependent, and lacks standardisation, limiting its ability to achieve consistent surgical accuracy.

Methods: This narrative review systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and IEEE Xplore for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2015 and June 2025. We included original research evaluating AI-driven preoperative CT 3D planning for THA, with quantitative outcomes on cup angle or size accuracy. Data were extracted and assessed for methodological quality using standard tools.

Results: AI-assisted planning consistently improved accuracy: mean angular errors for inclination and anteversion were below 3*, size matching accuracy within ±1 size ranged from 80% to 85%, and planning time was reduced by 57% to 70% compared with manual templating. These findings were reproducible across different deep-learning architectures and patient cohorts.

Discussion: Although AI planning shows clear benefits in accuracy and efficiency, several challenges remain-including limited generalisability to complex anatomies, susceptibility to image artefacts, and insufficient integration with intraoperative execution. Future research should prioritise multi-centre validation, dynamic functional planning,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free