Evidence Hub

The Clinical Effects of Sildenafil for Erection in Patients after Kidney Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis

Liu LY, Sun T, Liu Y, Sun YY, Ma FZ

Nephron, 2019

13 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the wide use of sildenafil in kidney-transplanted patients, it is vital to recognize the effectiveness and safety in clinical practice.

METHODS: Full-text articles involving the application of sildenafil after renal transplantation searched out in multiple databases were reviewed. All the meta-analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.0 software and bias analysis of the studies were conducted to examine the quality of articles. In addition, to estimate possible publication bias, funnel plot and the Egger's test were used.

RESULT: Finally 7 articles eventually satisfied the inclusion criteria. The penetration ability and maintenance frequency in sildenafil group were much larger than those of control group. Except orgasmic function, domains of the International Index of Erectile Function have showed larger scores in sildenafil group than those of control group. No significant difference of the concentration of cyclosporine was observed between sildenafil and control group.

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study showed that treatment with sildenafil in renal allograft recipients with erectile dysfunction is a valid and safe option.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free