Evidence Hub

Sildenafil-driven cone PDE6 inhibition alters receptive-field properties of retinal ganglion cells ex vivo

Bałamut B, Węgrzyn P, Posłuszny A, Foik AT

2025

Abstract

Suppressing the phototransduction cascade has a profound impact on visual information processing in the retina. Here, we examined how acute silencing of photoreceptors alters stimulus preference of Retinal Ganglion Cells (RGCs) without affecting retinal anatomy. Using ex vivo recordings from C57BL/6 mouse retinas, we applied the phosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6) inhibitor Sildenafil and compared responses to flash and drifting-grating stimuli before and after treatment. Flash responses revealed six physiological RGC populations under control conditions. After Sildenafil, Off-responses were completely abolished, and most cells adopted On-like profiles with markedly prolonged response latencies. At the population level, orientation selectivity was preserved; however, RGCs lost the ability to detect spatial frequencies above 0.05 cycle/° and temporal frequencies above 2 cycle/s. A subset of cells increased their firing rates and transformed from orientation-selective into direction-selective cells, indicating reorganization of tuning properties. To assess photoreceptor specificity of Sildenafil, we tested Gnat1 (rod-deficient, cone-only) and Gnat2 (cone-deficient, rod-only) mouse models. Sildenafil completely removed visually evoked responses in Gnat1 retinas, but not in Gnat2, demonstrating preferential inhibition of cone PDE6. These results show that cone-selective suppression of phototransduction is sufficient to abolish Off-pathway signaling, reduce high-frequency visual…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free