Evidence Hub

Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Lithuania: Current Situation and Analysis of Survival of Patients Treated with Different Treatment Regimens

Miliauskas S, Hoppenot D, Dimiene I, Grigoniene E, Gumbiene L, Nedzelskiene I, Vaizgela M, Ereminiene E

Journal of clinical medicine, 2026

117 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Since 2015, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-specific medications have been fully reimbursed in Lithuania. To describe the current situation of PAH treatment in the country and to determine survival during different PAH treatment regimens. Methods: The data from the Institute of Hygiene and the State Data Agency of Lithuania cases with administrative codes I27.0 and I27.8 have been evaluated. Results: In 2025, 225 confirmed cases of PAH were treated with PAH-specific medications in two PH centers. At least one PAH-specific medication was prescribed to 163 (72.4%) female and 62 (27.6%) male patients. Among these, 96 (42.7%) received sildenafil monotherapy, 82 (36.4%) received a combination of sildenafil and an ERA, 36 (16.0%) were on triple PAH-specific therapy (including selexipag or treprostinil), and 11 (4.9%) received other regimens due to specific medical considerations. The age of adults treated with sildenafil monotherapy vs. other therapies was 63.9 ± 14.8 (n = 117) and 51.5 ± 17.3 (n = 116) years, respectively (p n = 19], selexipag [n = 6], or inhaled iloprost [n = 4] were prescribed as the third drug). Patients who died and received triple therapy were younger than those on mono- and dual therapy (age at diagnosis 45.0 ± 21.6, 67.2 ± 14.7 and 61.6 ± 16.3 years, respectively, p p = 0.04), and the longest was in those receiving triple therapy (59.9 ± 29.4 months; p Conclusions: The availability of reimbursed medications dramatically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 117 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free