Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetic Characterization and Bioequivalence of Sildenafil Citrate Orally Disintegrating Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

Zhang Y, Du L, Liu S, Chen G, Han H, Huang J, Jiang H, Wang X et al.

Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2026

38 participants

Abstract

This study characterized the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and evaluated the bioequivalence of sildenafil citrate under fasting conditions in Chinese subjects. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period crossover study was conducted. Thirty-eight subjects were randomized (1:1) to the TR or RT sequence and received the test (T) and reference (R) formulations in the two study periods separated by an adequate washout. Plasma concentrations of sildenafil and N-desmethyl sildenafil were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were derived by noncompartmental analysis using Phoenix WinNonlin (version 8.4), and bioequivalence was assessed based on the geometric mean ratios (GMRs; T/R) and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for sildenafil Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞. All 38 subjects completed the study. Following administration of T and R, the mean ± SD Cmax of sildenafil was 319.08 ± 124.07 and 334.89 ± 189.28 ng/mL, respectively; AUC0-t was 838.10 ± 351.13 and 823.64 ± 346.63 h ng/mL; and AUC0-∞ was 872.05 ± 360.26 and 856.12 ± 357.16 h ng/mL. For N-desmethyl sildenafil, the mean ± SD Cmax was 171.97 ± 70.05 and 168.67 ± 64.07 ng/mL; AUC0-t was 708.51 ± 372.91 and 667.19 ± 315.07 h ng/mL; and AUC0-∞ was 746.10 ± 378.76 and 705.23 ± 329.39 h ng/mL, respectively. The 90% CIs for the GMRs (T/R) of sildenafil Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 92.69%-106.36%, 97.26%-106.81%, and 97.39%-106.76%,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 38 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free