Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of bosentan-related therapy in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Li G, Du X, Luo W, Wei J, Huang H

Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bosentan-related therapy in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN).

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to March 2026 for clinical studies of bosentan in neonates with PPHN (CRD420261338730). Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Outcomes included treatment failure, change in pulmonary artery pressure, length of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, absolute tricuspid regurgitation values at 72 h, reduction in tricuspid regurgitation at 72 h, and safety.

Results: Nine studies were included from 187 identified records. Bosentan-related therapy was associated with a lower treatment failure rate than control treatment (RR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.14-0.51; P P P = 0.01). Reduction in pulmonary artery pressure also favoured bosentan-related therapy, although the difference was of borderline significance (MD: -2.69, 95% CI -5.40-0.01; P = 0.05). By contrast, bosentan-related therapy was not associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay (MD: -1.06, 95% CI -2.38-0.27; P = 0.12), and duration of mechanical ventilation was longer in the bosentan-related therapy group (MD: 2.04, 95% CI 1.26-2.82; P < 0.00001). Reported adverse events included hypotension, anaemia, oedema, vomiting, and hepatic abnormalities,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free