Evidence Hub

A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Study Comparing the Safety and Tolerability of Iloprost Inhalation Solution Delivered by I-neb Utilizing Power Disc-15 and Power Disc-6 in Patients With Symptomatic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2010

49 participants

Abstract

Patients with symptomatic idiopathic (IPAH) or familial (FPAH) pulmonary arterial hypertension in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV , naive to PAH treatment or currently being treated with a stable dose of either bosentan or sildenafil and who complete PROWESS 15 will be enrolled in the PROWESS 15 Extension study. This is a double-blind (12 week), randomized study to compare the safety and tolerability of inhaled iloprost power disc-15 and power disc-6 in patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). After completion of the double blind period, patients will be entered in the open label period using iloprost power disc-15.

Conditions: Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Primary outcome: Treatment-emergent Adverse Events; Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events; Adverse Events Leading to Premature Discontinuation of Study Drug; Patients With Adverse Events Leading to Premature Discontinuation of Study Drug.

Enrollment: 49 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 49 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free