Evidence Hub

Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy of sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor on high altitude hypoxia and its complications

Xu Y, Liu Y, Liu J, Qian G

High altitude medicine & biology, 2014

72 participants · 26 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High altitude illness can be life-threatening if left untreated. Acute mountain sickness and high altitude pulmonary hypertension are two syndromes of high altitude illness. Recent clinical studies showed the beneficial effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors on the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. In this report, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy of PDE-5 inhibitors on high altitude hypoxia and its complications.

METHODS: Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of PDE-5 inhibitor in the setting of high altitude were identified by searching Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (September 2013), PubMed (from 1990 to September 2013), and EMBASE (from 1990 to September 2013). Extracted outcomes from selected studies for meta-analysis included arterial oxygen saturation, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, heart rate, and Lake Louise Consensus AMS symptom score. Weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were presented for the continuous outcomes.

RESULTS: Five clinical trials that met the selection criteria were identified for the meta-analysis. All of these studies used sildenafil as the PDE-5 inhibitor. A total of 60 subjects received sildenafil, and 72 subjects were given placebo. In accordance with previous report, short-term treatment with sildenafil (1-2 days) significantly reduced pulmonary artery systolic pressure at rest (MD -4.53; 95% CI -6.72, -2.34; p<0.0001). However,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 72 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free