Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil therapy in pulmonary artery hypertension: a meta-analysis

Kuang TG, Wang J, Zhai ZG, Guo XH, Wang C

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 2007

328 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of sildenafil in treatment of pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH).

METHODS: Literatures in regard to sildenafil treatment of PAH were searched in PubMed (from 01/01/1968 to 01/05/2006), Embase (from 1980 to 2006) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (from 1994 to 2006). Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) of sildenafil versus placebo in the treatment of PAH were conducted. The quality of the included trials was evaluated by two reviewers independently. Meta-analysis was done by using the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 4.2.8.

RESULTS: Ten literatures were retrieved. Four RCTs, including 328 patients, were included and were graded in terms of the quality of randomization, allocation, concealment and blinding. One study was graded as level A and the other three were graded as level B. The meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo treatment, sildenafil therapy can (1) improve the exercise capacity of the PAH patients measured as distance covered in a 6 minute walk test with an increase of 55.76 meters on average in 6 minutes' walk (95% confidence interval, 41.26 to 70.25; P < 0.01), (2) increase the exercise time of the PAH patients by 221.13s on average (95% confidence interval, 146.13 to 296.14; P < 0.01), (3) decrease the pulmonary artery systolic pressure by 11.51 mmHg on average (95% confidence interval, 1.41 to 21.60, P = 0.03), and (4) alleviate the exacerbation of clinical conditions with a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 328 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free