Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil treatment in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review

Wang RC, Jiang FM, Zheng QL, Li CT, Peng XY, He CY, Luo J, Liang ZA

Respiratory medicine, 2014

545 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of using sildenafil for ≥ 12 weeks to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of sildenafil therapy in patients with PAH published through May 2013 were identified by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, relevant websites, and reference lists of relevant studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the trials and extracted information.

RESULTS: Meta-analysis was carried out with subsets of 4 trials involving 545 patients. Sildenafil therapy significantly reduced clinical worsening of PAH compared to placebo (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21-0.69) and improved the 6-min walk distance (MD 31.3 m, 95% CI 18.01-44.67), WHO functional class, hemodynamic variables and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Sildenafil did not, however, improve all-cause mortality (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.02-4.94) or Borg dyspnea score relative to placebo, nor did it significantly affect the incidence of serious adverse events. In fact, sildenafil was associated with higher total incidence of adverse events, but these additional events were mild to moderate in severity and were tolerable.

CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil therapy lasting ≥ 12 weeks improves multiple clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with PAH, but it appears to have no effect on mortality or serious adverse events. The long-term efficacy and safety of sildenafil therapy in PAH requires further study based on large and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 545 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free