Evidence Hub

Meta-analysis addressing the impact of cardiovascular-acting medication on peak oxygen uptake of patients with HFpEF.

Boulmpou A, Theodorakopoulou MP, Alexandrou ME, Boutou AK, Papadopoulos CE, Pella E, Sarafidis P, Vassilikos V

Heart failure reviews, 2022

1,341 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

As our therapeutic armamentarium for HFpEF is insufficient, research has been focusing on the potential beneficial effect of existing pharmaceutical regimens on this specific patient population. A series of RCTs have recently examined the impact of various pharmaceutical treatments with proven benefit in HFrEF, on the improvement of symptoms of HFpEF patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis comprised studies of adult patients with HFpEF and evaluated the impact of different cardiovascular acting medication on cardiorespiratory fitness, reflected by peak VO2 values measured during CPET. The primary outcome was difference between groups in the change of peak VO2 (ΔpeakVO2). Literature search involved PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Our search identified 3634 records and 19 studies were included in qualitative analysis; 12 studies with 1341 patients were finally included in primary outcome analysis. ΔpeakVO2 between baseline and study-end did not significantly change after treatment with spironolactone, ivabradine, sildenafil, or oral inorganic nitrate and neither did difference in 6MWT distance after treatment with spironolactone. Spironolactone led to statistically significant reduction in E/E' ratio study-end values (WMD - 1.64, 95%CI - 2.42 to - 0.86, I2 = 87%, p < 0.0001), as well as to a significant increase in MLHFQ values (WMD 0.75, 95%CI 0.02 to 1.48, I2 = 0%, p = 0.65), indicating deterioration in HRQoL among HFpEF patients. A series of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,341 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free