Evidence Hub

Efficacy of sildenafil citrate in men with erectile dysfunction following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lu X, Han H, Xing N, Tian L

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 2015

1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil citrate for post bilateral nerve-sparig radical prostatectomy (post-BNSRP) erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS: The following keywords: sildenafil, radical prostatectomy were used to search in Medline, Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Database. The title, abstract and keywords of each article were independently screened by two reviewers. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) published between 1990 and 2014 were retrieved according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil citrate for post-BNSRP ED were systematically assessed by meta-analysis.

RESULTS: Four RCTs with 320 cases were included after literature retrieval and filtering. The potency rates were 32.1% (35/109) and 11.3% (7/62) between sildenafil and placebo groups after meta-analysis and showed statistically significant differences (OR = 4.66, 95% CI: 1.79-12.11). IIEF-5 score in sildenafil group was significant higher than that in the placebo group (WMD: 4.73, 95% CI: 3.26-6.19). In subgroup meta-analysis, the potency rates in high-dose, low-dose sildenafil groups and placebo groups were 30.4% (14/46), 25.0% (10/40) and 4.5% (2/44), respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the high-dose subgroup and placebo group (OR = 9.32, 95% CI: 1.96-44.23), and the low-dose subgroup and placebo group (OR = 6.99, 95% CI: 1.43-34.22). But there was no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free