Evidence Hub

Doppler ultrasound, a noninvasive tool for the study of mesenteric arterial flow in systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study of a patient cohort with review and meta-analysis of the literature

Bandini G, Monami M, Ciuti G, Mercatelli P, Lo Cricchio A, De Santis MC, Bonomi F, Bellando Randone S et al.

Internal and emergency medicine, 2025

5 citations

Abstract

Gastrointestinal involvement (GI) is a frequent and troublesome complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc), whose etiology is poorly understood, though it is hypothesized that autoimmunity and progressive vasculopathy may play a role. Vasculopathy is considered one of the main pathogenetic pathways responsible for many of the clinical manifestations of SSc, and, therefore, studying the principal splanchnic vessels (i.e., superior mesenteric artery-SMA and inferior mesenteric artery-IMA) with Doppler Ultrasound (DUS) may provide further insights into measuring the progression of vasculopathy, evaluating its possible association with SSc GI symptoms, and determining whether it plays a role in the development or severity of SSc GI disease. A cohort of SSc patients consecutively recruited underwent DUS examination, and associations with GI (UCLA-GIT 2.0 questionnaire) and extraintestinal SSc characteristics were evaluated. Semiquantitative DUS parameters (resistive index-RI and pulsatility index-PI), were applied for splanchnic vessel assessment in SSc patients and healthy subjects (HS). Moreover, a review and meta-analysis of the literature to understand which the values of the main semiquantitative DUS parameters (RI and PI) are both in SSc patients and HS has been conducted. Seventy-eight patients completed DUS examinations and clinical assessments. 30 (39%) were classified as diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSC), 35 (45%) as limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and 13 (17%) as sine…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free