Evidence Hub

Assessing the role of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for improvement of myocardial performance in adolescentswith abnormal cardiac physiology following fontan palliation : a meta-analysis

N. Patel, T. Warsi, A. Kumar, H. Jain, K. Soni, R. Ahmed, R. Kelkar

European Heart Journal, 2025

464 participants

Abstract

The Fontan operation represents a cornerstone in the surgical management of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), a complex congenital cardiac anomaly characterized by underdevelopment of the left ventricle, aortic arch, and mitral valve. While this palliation allows survival into adolescence and adulthood, it imposes significant hemodynamic burdens. The physiological constraints manifest clinically as impaired cardiovascular efficiency, exercise intolerance, ventricular dysfunction, and heightened risks of long-term morbidity such as protein-losing enteropathy, arrhythmias, and heart failure. In response to these challenges, recent studies have focused on pharmacotherapeutic strategies to enhance myocardial performance and functional capacity, with particular emphasis on phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors such as oral sildenafil and udenafil in adolescent populations following Fontan palliation.

A comprehensive search of major databases like PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar was conducted to retrieve eligible studies. The inverse variance random-effects model was used to generate pooled effects estimates of outcomes as mean difference (MD) and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval.

3 RCTs with 464 participants of age 14-16 years showcased that administration of PDE-5 inhibitors such as Sildenafil and Udenenafil in adolescents following Fontan palliation showed no significant difference in peak O2 consumption [MD: 0.17; 95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 464 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free