Evidence Hub

Systemic Drugs Associated With Maculopathy

Kim J, Ahn SJ, Park J, Gower EW, Chung JE

JAMA ophthalmology, 2025

50 participants

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Systemic medications may have unrecognized macular toxic effects; early identification might be important for vision preservation.

OBJECTIVES: To identify systemic drugs potentially associated with maculopathy via pharmacovigilance reporting and to evaluate their macular adverse effects in a nationwide encounter database.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 2-part study included (1) disproportionality analysis for candidate identification, using 15 748 maculopathy-related individual case safety reports from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between July 2014 and December 2023, and (2) a population-based cohort study for association evaluation, using the South Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database among users of the candidate drugs, covering approximately 50 million individuals. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023.

EXPOSURE: Use of systemic drugs identified as candidate signals in FAERS.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Reporting odds ratios for signal detection in FAERS and incidence rate ratios, hazard ratios, and cumulative incidence of maculopathy in HIRA.

RESULTS: Five systemic drugs with underrecognized macular toxic effects-fingolimod, apixaban, paclitaxel, ibrutinib, and sildenafil-were identified among the top 30 maculopathy signals in FAERS. In HIRA, the incidence rate ratios for maculopathy following exposure (vs preexposure) were 1.92 (95% CI, 0.62-5.96)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free