Evidence Hub

PDE-5 inhibition mitigates mental stress-induced endothelial dysfunction in resistant hypertension

Storch AS, Rocha HNM, Mattos JD, Prodel E, Mentzinger J, Teixeira GF, Cytrangulo MS, Rosado RL et al.

American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Resistant hypertension (RH) is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events, and mental stress (MS) is one of the major risk factors. We aimed to test the hypothesis that a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (iPDE5) would minimize the deleterious effects of MS on the endothelial function of those patients. In two experimental days, patients with RH (63 ± 5 yr; 30.2 ± 3.1 kg/m2) received iPDE5 (sildenafil citrate; 50 mg) or a placebo (PL) pill, in a randomized, crossover, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial. After 30 min, subjects underwent a 5-min MS task (modified Stroop Color-Word Test). Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and blood flow (BF) measurements (vascular ultrasound), pulse wave analysis (applanation tonometry), and blood sampling (for vasoactive substances and cGMP measurements) were performed at baseline, during or immediately after MS, and 30 min after MS (MS30). Blood pressure, heart rate, and BF increased during the MS task in both conditions (P ≤ 0.02 vs. rest). FMD decreased immediately after MS (P < 0.01 vs. baseline) and MS30 (P < 0.01 vs. baseline) in the PL condition, whereas it was higher in MS (P = 0.03 vs. PL) and MS30 (P < 0.01 vs. baseline; P = 0.04 vs. MS; P < 0.01 vs. PL) in the iPDE5 condition. Peripheral and central systolic blood pressures were lower while plasma nitrate and cGMP were higher in the iPDE5 condition throughout the protocol (P ≤ 0.04 vs. rest). Present data suggest that iPDE5 prevents MS-induced…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free