Evidence Hub

Persistent pulmonary hypertension in children after apparent resolution of ultrasound-defined pulmonary hypertension associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Takeoka M, Sawada H, Mitani Y, Ohashi H, Yodoya N, Ohya K, Tsuboya N, Harada T et al.

European journal of pediatrics, 2024

56 participants

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To evaluate pulmonary hemodynamics in patients who had been followed up for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)-associated pulmonary hypertension (PH) in the mid-term by right heart catheterization (RHC). A retrospective study was conducted among 56 patients who were born at a gestational age < 28 weeks during 2018-2020, and the consecutive patients complicated by BPD and ultrasound-defined PH (n = 10, 18%), of whom 7 patients were treated with sildenafil, were examined by RHC in the mid-term follow-up (median age: 25 months [IQR: 19-32]). Ultrasound study at RHC showed improvement in PH as represented by left ventricular end-systolic eccentricity index (median [IQR], 1.05 [IQR: 1.03-1.06] vs. 1.18 [IQR: 1.15-1.33]), pulmonary artery acceleration time (PAAT) (mean ± SD, 97.3 ± 18.2 vs. 55.2 ± 10.1) and a ratio of PAAT to right ventricular ejection time (0.35 ± 0.05 vs. 0.25 ± 0.04) compared with those at 40 weeks of postmenstrual age (PMA) (p < 0.05, respectively). RHC (mean pulmonary artery [PA] pressure: 21 [19-22] mmHg; pulmonary vascular resistance index [PVRi]: 2.63 [1.95-2.94] Wood Units·m2) revealed that 5 infants (50%) had mild PH (21-24 mmHg) and reduced peripheral PAs by pulmonary wedge angiography. The presence of emphysema on chest CT at 40 weeks of PMA and moderate/marked reduction of contrast filling in peripheral PAs on angiography were correlated with increased PVRi (p < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION: We observed that even after apparent resolution…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free