Evidence Hub

Liver Transplantation for a Patient With Hemophilia and HIV/HCV Coinfection Complicated by Pulmonary Hypertension

Satoh A, Soyama A, Matsushima H, Kinoshita A, Hara T, Uehira T, Ichinomiya T, Sekino M et al.

Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, 2026

Abstract

Liver transplantation for patients with hemophilia and HIV/HCV coinfection presents unique challenges due to the complexity of perioperative management, including coagulation disorders, drug interactions, and potential complications such as pulmonary hypertension. We report a successful case of brain-dead donor liver transplantation in a patient with hemophilia B and HIV/HCV coinfection, complicated by pulmonary hypertension. The patient, a man in his 50s, acquired multidrug-resistant HIV and HCV in childhood from contaminated blood products. Despite successful HCV eradication, liver function declined, and he was listed for transplantation. Preoperative evaluation revealed pulmonary arterial hypertension, which improved with sildenafil citrate, macitentan, and home oxygen therapy. Intraoperatively, coagulation was managed with factor IX supplementation, and circulation remained stable following reperfusion. Postoperatively, immunosuppression, antiretroviral therapy, and treatment for pulmonary hypertension were carefully coordinated to avoid drug interactions. Nitric oxide therapy was utilized to improve oxygenation. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 51 with normal liver function and good overall condition. This case underscores the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and careful perioperative planning in achieving successful outcomes in liver transplantation for patients with complex comorbidities such as hemophilia, HIV/HCV coinfection, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free