Evidence Hub

Utilisation of a post-Fontan management pathway reduces chest tube drainage and hospital readmission rates

Skaff AM, Kikano SD, Weiner JG, Staudt GE, Maynord PO, Bichell DP, Parra DA

Cardiology in the young, 2024

36 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complications following the Fontan procedure include prolonged pleural drainage and readmission for effusions. To address these complications, a post-Fontan management pathway was implemented with primary goals of reducing chest tube duration/reinsertion rates and decreasing hospital length of stay and readmissions.

METHODS: Fontan patients were identified by retrospective chart review (2017-2019) to obtain baseline data for chest tube duration/reinsertion rates, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates for effusion. A post-Fontan management pathway was implemented (2020-2021) utilising post-operative vasopressin, nasal cannula oxygen until chest tube removal, and discharge regimen of three times daily diuretics, sildenafil, and afterload reducing medications. Patients were followed to evaluate primary outcomes.

RESULTS: The pre- and post-pathway groups were similar in single ventricle morphology, demographics, and pre-operative haemodynamics. Forty-three and 36 patients were included in the pre- and post-pathway cohorts, respectively. There were statistically significant reductions in chest tube duration (8 vs. 5 days, p ≤ 0.001), chest tube output on post-operative day 4 (20.4 vs. 9.9 mL/kg/day, p = 0.003), and hospital readmission rates for effusion (13[30%] vs. 3[8%], p = 0.02) compared to baseline. There was an absolute reduction in hospital length of stay (11 vs. 9.5 days, p = 0.052). When combining average cost savings for the Fontan…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 36 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free