Evidence Hub

Efficacy of milrinone plus sildenafil in the treatment of neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension: A single center, randomized controlled trial from a resource limited setting

Muhammad Awais Roomi, Abdur Rehman Malik, Rana Tashfeen Arshad, Muhammad Zahid, M. Arshad

The Professional Medical Journal, 2025

21 participants

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcomes of milrinone plus sildenafil versus sildenafil alone in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPH) in neonates. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Neonatology, The Children’s Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Multan, Pakistan. Period: December 2023 to May 2024. Methods: A total of 42 neonates, diagnosed to have PPH were enrolled. Neonates were randomized to either oral sildenafil monotherapy (n=21) or oral sildenafil and intravenous (IV) milrinone (n=21). Primary outcome was decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Secondary outcomes were improvement in oxygen saturation, duration of hospitalization, treatment related side effects, and mortality. Results: In a total of 42 neonates, 25 (59.5%) were boys. The mean age at the time of enrollment was 9.63±3.51 days. The mean PASP at the time of enrollment was 55.73±7.91 mmHg. PASP was statistically similar at baseline (p=0.5512), and day-3 (p=0.2163). At day-7, PASP was significantly reduced in sildenafil plus milrinone group was reported in comparison sildenafil group (37.62±8.04 mmHg vs. 42.92±8.25 mmHg, p=0.0413). SPO2, mortality, and post-treatment complications were statistically similar among neonates of both study groups. The duration of hospitalization was significantly less among neonates of sildenafil plus milrinone group vs. sildenafil group (13.58±2.93 days vs. 16.82±4.24 days, p=0.0063). Conclusion: Combined oral…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free