Evidence Hub

Sildenafil for bronchopulmonary dysplasia-associated pulmonary hypertension: A systematic search and narrative synthesis

Katayama Y, Hirata K, Nishimura Y, Nakahari A, Takeoka M, Watanabe M, Isayama T, Japan Evidence Based Neonatology (JEBNeo)

Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society, 2026

666 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although sildenafil is commonly used for bronchopulmonary dysplasia-associated pulmonary hypertension (BPD-PH), high-quality evidence to justify its use remains sparse. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of sildenafil in preterm infants with BPD or BPD-PH.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized and non-randomized comparative studies identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Ichushi-Web until November 28, 2024. The primary outcome measure was mortality at the time of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge.

RESULTS

Among the 1944 studies identified, 54 were eligible for full-text screening; however, none met the systematic review criteria. A post hoc narrative synthesis summarized the outcomes of preterm BPD-PH infants receiving sildenafil in nine studies, which were ineligible for the systematic review due to the lack of control groups. These studies included 15-666 infants born in high-income countries from 2001 to 2022. Sildenafil treatment improved the PH symptoms in 47%-77% of patients according to the echocardiographic findings. In patients receiving sildenafil, mortality before NICU discharge was 13%-35% and the rate of severe retinopathy of prematurity was 16%-57%.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence to support the use of sildenafil treatment for preterm infants with BPD-PH to improve mortality and morbidity is lacking. More research, particularly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 666 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free