Evidence Hub

PBPK modeling: What is the role of CYP3A4 expression in the gastrointestinal tract to accurately predict first-pass metabolism?

Henriot J, Dallmann A, Dupuis F, Perrier J, Frechen S

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

Gastrointestinal first-pass metabolism plays an important role in bioavailability and in drug-drug interactions. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is a powerful tool to integrate these processes mechanistically. However, a correct bottom-up prediction of GI first-pass metabolism is challenging and depends on various model parameters like the level of enzyme expression and the basolateral intestinal mucosa permeability (Pmucosa). This work aimed to investigate if cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 expression could help predict the first-pass effect using PBPK modeling or whether additional factors like Pmucosa do play additional roles using PBPK modeling. To this end, a systematic review of the absolute CYP3A expression in the human gastrointestinal tract and liver was conducted. The resulting CYP3A4 expression profile and two previously published profiles were applied to PBPK models of seven CYP3A4 substrates (alfentanil, alprazolam, felodipine, midazolam, sildenafil, triazolam, and verapamil) built-in PK-Sim®. For each compound, it was assessed whether first-pass metabolism could be adequately predicted based on the integrated CYP3A4 expression profile alone or whether an optimization of Pmucosa was required. Evaluation criteria were the precision of the predicted interstudy bioavailabilities and area under the concentration-time curves. It was found that none of the expression profiles provided upfront an adequate description of the extent of GI metabolism and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free