Evidence Hub

Efficacy of fasudil in COPD-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Shu P, Xu G, Liu Y, Qu NN

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

865 participants

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a serious complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that markedly worsens functional capacity and prognosis. Fasudil, a selective Rho-kinase inhibitor, has shown vasodilatory and vascular-protective effects; however, its therapeutic value in COPD-associated PAH has not been systematically quantified.

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of fasudil as an adjunctive therapy for COPD patients with PAH through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2024 for RCTs comparing fasudil plus conventional therapy with conventional therapy alone. Primary outcomes included overall treatment effectiveness and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Secondary outcomes were blood oxygen saturation (SaO₂), arterial oxygen tension (PaO₂), and 6-min walk distance (6MWT). Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 11 RCTs involving 865 participants met the inclusion criteria. Fasudil significantly increased the overall effective rate (risk ratio = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.05-1.31, p = 0.004) and reduced PASP (mean difference = -9.42 mmHg, 95% CI = -10.73 to -8.12, p p = 0.002). Functional capacity improved substantially, with a 51.96-m gain in 6MWT distance (95% CI = 36.84-67.08, p < 0.001), exceeding the minimal clinically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 865 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free