Evidence Hub

Systems biology approaches investigating mitochondrial dysfunction in cyanotic heart disease: a systematic review

Elbatarny M, Lu YT, Hu M, Coles J, Mital S, Ross-White A, Honjo O, Barron DJ et al.

EBioMedicine, 2025

23 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background: Cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD) affects over 3 million individuals globally and can progress to heart failure. Mitochondrial dysfunction is well established in adult heart failure and is also a central feature of CCHD. CCHD cyanosis itself contributes to further mitochondrial dysfunction. Systems biology methods detail the epigenomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic profile of biological samples. This systematic review highlights CCHD systems biology literature related to mitochondrial dysfunction.

Methods: OVID/Medline was searched between January 2010 and June 2025. Studies implementing untargeted systems biology methods in CCHD tissue or plasma were included. Genes with differential expression between CCHD and unaffected controls were pooled and analysed using GO term functional enrichment for pathway analysis, transcription factor and kinase enrichment, and metabolic pathways.

Findings: From 31 included studies (genomic: n = 5, epigenomic: n = 3, transcriptomic: n = 23, proteomic: n = 2, metabolomic: n = 3, lipidomic: n = 1), we identified 8 pathogenic/likely pathogenic single nucleotide polymorphisms, 73 differentially methylated genes, 4170 differentially expressed genes, 173 differentially expressed proteins between CCHD versus unaffected controls. Several genes involved in mitochondrial respiratory chain (NDUFV1, NDUFV2, NDUFA5, NDUFS3, COX5A, COQ7) were identified.

Interpretation: CCHD pathogenesis and progression are associated with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free