Evidence Hub

Importance of PERK pathway modulation on colorectal cancer management: a systematic review

Nemati M, Dastghaib S, Hosseinzadeh Z, Molayem M, Siri M, Ebrahimi B, Bagheri Z

BMC cancer, 2025

173 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: The protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) branch of the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) plays a complex and context-dependent role in the colorectal cancer (CRC). While some studies indicate that PERK activation suppresses tumor growth by inducing apoptosis and limiting proliferation, others suggest that it may promote tumor progression by supporting cancer cell survival under stress. This systematic review aims to clarify the dual role of PERK signaling in CRC and evaluate its potential as a therapeutic target.

Methods: We included full-text English-language studies investigating the role of PERK signaling in CRC using in vitro and/or animal models. Studies on non-CRC malignancies or unrelated mechanisms were excluded. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus using relevant keywords.

Results: A total of 395 articles were initially identified. After removing duplicates (n = 173), review articles (n = 11), and unrelated studies (n = 66), 45 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of these (n = 36) used in vitro models, with the HCT-116 cell line being the most frequently used (n = 19). While most studies (n = 36) reported anti-tumorigenic effects associated with PERK activation, several identified conditions under which PERK signaling may support tumor progression. These conflicting findings may be attributed to differences in experimental models, PERK modulation strategies, and endoplasmic reticulum stress…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 173 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free