Evidence Hub

Cardiovascular disease in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Li Y, Tan W, Zhang Y, Cao F, Wu Z, Jiao Y, Niu J

Frontiers in medicine, 2025

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities can affect drug tolerability and health outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the magnitudes of association between IPF and both overall and specific categories of CV disease.

Methods: The PRISMA guidelines and PICO model were followed. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (Sinomed) from inception to April 2025 for studies investigating CV disease in IPF patients. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Pooled odds ratio (OR) for case-control/cross-sectional datasets and relative risk (RR) for cohort datasets were calculated using Review Manager 5.4. The I 2 test was used to evaluate the heterogeneity and the sources of heterogeneity were explored through sensitivity analyses, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses. The funnel plot and Egger's test were used to evaluate publication bias.

Results: A total of 28 studies comprising 29 case-control/cross-sectional datasets and four cohort datasets were included, which indicated a positive association between IPF and CV disease (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.84-3.24, P P = 0.02). Meta-regression and maximized subgroup analyses confirmed the influence of control characteristics (P P = 0.027), Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score (P = 0.022), certainty of CV disease diagnosis (P = 0.027), body mass index (BMI), smoking…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free