Evidence Hub

The landscape of recurrent spontaneous abortion registered on clinical trials.gov

Zhou X, Lai F, Chen W, Zhou C, Deng Y, Wang T, Xing S, Diao H et al.

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024

100 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objective: Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) presents a significant challenge in the field of reproductive medicine, as effective treatments remain limited despite extensive research efforts. A comprehensive understanding of current RSA clinical trials is essential for enhancing trial design and identifying existing research gaps. The aim of this study is to characterize RSA related clinical trials registered on Clinical Trials.gov.

Methods: A thorough search was conducted to identify and review clinical trials focusing on RSA that were registered on Clinical Trials.gov up to March2, 2024.

Results: A total of 138 trials were identified in the analysis, with 72 (52.17%) classified as intervention trials and 66 (47.83%) as observational trials. Approximately half of the studies (67,48.55%) had an enrollment of 100 participants or fewer. The majority of trials included only female participants. Asia hosted the highest number of clinical trials (46,33.33%), followed by Europe (36,26.09%), Africa (29,21.01%), America (13,9.42%). The majority of trials (61,44.20%) focused on individuals with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA). The predominant intervention types examined in the reviewed studies were drug interventions (49,62.82%), with a notable rise in behavioral intervention trials.

Conclusion: Our research findings suggest that existing research efforts in the realm of RSA are inadequate for the progression of prevention and treatment strategies. The majority…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free