Evidence Hub

Nerve Repair for Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Outcomes

Edwin E. Chrabieh, Paul Beaineh, T. Sebai, Abdul Jabar Chekfa, Fadi Ghieh, K. Makkawi, Bishara Atiyeh, B. Bachir et al.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open, 2025

Abstract

Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent complication after radical prostatectomy (RP), affecting up to 89% of patients within 2–5 years due to cavernous nerve injury. Nerve grafting has been proposed as a strategy to restore erectile function, but outcomes remain inconsistent, and randomized controlled trials have yielded mixed results. This review evaluated the effectiveness of nerve grafting techniques for ED management after RP. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases was conducted using terms related to ED, nerve grafting, and cavernous nerve repair. From 239 initial studies, 17 met the inclusion criteria, focusing on human subjects and reporting outcomes of unilateral or bilateral nerve grafting with autologous donor nerves, such as the sural and genitofemoral nerves. Results: Bilateral sural nerve grafting demonstrated the highest recovery rates, with up to 71% of patients regaining erectile function sufficient for intercourse. Adjunctive therapies like sildenafil were frequently used to enhance outcomes. However, randomized controlled trials showed no statistically significant improvements compared with controls, raising questions about the efficacy of nerve grafting. Variability in outcomes seemed to be influenced by donor nerve choice, surgical expertise, and patient characteristics, such as age and baseline function. Conclusions: Although bilateral sural nerve grafting offers promising results, its overall efficacy is…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free