Evidence Hub

The effect of sustainable low-dose sildenafil and cognitive-behavioral training on sexual function in methadone-treated men-a randomized controlled trial

Tavakolifard N, Amini Z

Journal of addictive diseases, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction caused by opioids is one of the serious problems of drug misusers.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of continuous low-dose sildenafil treatment alongside psychological training on the sexual function of methadone-treated patients.

METHOD: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on methadone-treated men with sexual dysfunction. Patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups: sildenafil 25 mg and psychological training. Sexual Quality of Life-Men, Sexual Self-Efficacy Scale-Erectile, and the International Index of Erectile Function were used before and 4 weeks after the end of the intervention.

RESULTS: A total of 67 couples were included in the study (34 psychological interventions vs. 33 sildenafil group). After 4 weeks of treatment, the mean of male erectile function (33.73 ± 8.114 and 27.62 ± 6.238, p = 0.003) and sexual self-efficacy score (78.36 ± 12.713 and 69.62 ± 14.940, p < 0.0001) in the sildenafil group were statistically significant compared to the psychological group, however, the sexual quality score of the two groups was not statistically significant (31.48 ± 9.216 and 31.71 ± 11.333, p = 0.342).

CONCLUSIONS: The sexual function of methadone-treated men in both groups was significantly improved, yet this difference was significantly greater in the pharmaceutical treatment group than the trainings. As a result, due to the high need for treatment, any type of intervention (medication or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free