Evidence Hub

White matter hyperintensities are independently associated with systemic vascular aging and cerebrovascular dysfunction

Webb AJ, Feakins K, Lawson A, Stewart C, Thomas J, Llwyd O

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2025

75 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: In the Oxford Haemodynamic Adaptation to Reduce Pulsatility trial (OxHARP), sildenafil increased cerebrovascular reactivity but did not reduce cerebral pulsatility, a marker of vascular aging. This analysis of OxHARP tested whether these potentially causative mechanisms were independently associated with the severity of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). Aims: The aims were to determine independence of the relationship between severity of WMHs with both cerebral pulsatility and cerebrovascular reactivity in the same population. Methods: OxHARP was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in patients with mild-to-moderate WMH and previous minor cerebrovascular events. It determined effects on cerebrovascular pulsatility and reactivity on transcranial ultrasound and reactivity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Associations were determined between baseline ultrasound measures, and averaged MRI measures across follow-up, with the severity of WMH on clinical imaging (Fazekas or modified Blennow scores) and WMH volume in the MRI substudy, by ordinal and linear regression. Results: In 75/75 patients (median 70 years, 78% male), cerebral pulsatility was associated with age (p < 0.001) whereas reactivity on ultrasound was not (p = 0.29). Severity of WMH in all participants was independently associated with decreased cerebrovascular reactivity and increased cerebral pulsatility (pulsatility p = 0.016; reactivity…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 75 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free